HOUSE floor amendments [LINK] broaden the bill to cover a wide range of prostitution and trafficking-related crimes, especially those involving minors. They align penalties for these offenses with the trafficking statute, imposing 15–50 year or 25–50 year prison terms and fines up to $75,000 for crimes involving victims under 18 or 14. A new offense is created for soliciting or purchasing a minor for sex. The amendments also require property used in these crimes to be seized, mandate a $2,000 fine to fund victim services, expand the definition of trafficking-related offenses, and extend the prosecution window to 30 years after the victim turns 18. Several outdated or overlapping statutes are repealed and replaced under this unified framework.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] expand the bill's scope to include harsher penalties for purchasing commercial sexual activity and add new victim protections. They increase fines and prison terms, especially when the victim is a minor or a trafficking victim. The amendments also require that half of the fines be allocated to victim services and clarify that child victims cannot be prosecuted if their actions resulted from being trafficked. Adults identified as victims must be informed of available treatment or services.

Proposes amendments to Louisiana statutes R.S. 14:83(B)(1)(b) and R.S. 15:541(24)(a) to modify penalties for the crime of soliciting for prostitutes and to include second or subsequent offenses under sex offender registration requirements.

1.  Enhanced Penalties for Repeat Offenses (Section 1, R.S. 14:83(B)(1)(b)):

• Current Law: A second or subsequent offense of soliciting for prostitutes carries a fine of $1,500 to $2,000, imprisonment for up to one year, or both, with half of the fines distributed per R.S. 15:539.4.
• Proposed Change: The imprisonment term for a second or subsequent offense must be served at hard labor, increasing the severity of the penalty while retaining the fine range and distribution provision.

1. Inclusion in Sex Offender Registry (Section 2, R.S. 15:541(24)(a)):

• Current Law: The definition of "sex offense" under R.S. 15:541(24)(a) lists various crimes requiring sex offender registration (e.g., human trafficking, rape, sexual battery), but soliciting for prostitutes is not included.
• Proposed Change: Adds a second or subsequent conviction of soliciting for prostitutes (R.S. 14:83(B)(1)) to the list of "sex offenses," subjecting repeat offenders to sex offender registration and notification requirements.

HOUSE floor amendments [LINK] revise the offense to cover anyone who knowingly fails to apply payments toward utility bills for 60 days or more, or who uses deception in diverting those funds. The amendments specify that the law applies to individuals responsible for making utility payments and add a legislative intent section stating the law targets intentional misuse of utility funds under lease agreements—not honest mistakes or disputes. It is meant to address fraudulent patterns of nonpayment and applies to both individuals and entities.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] create a new crime called "misappropriation without violence" under R.S. 14:71.5. They remove references to racketeering and redefine penalties based on the value taken, ranging from up to 6 months for under $1,000 to up to 20 years and $50,000 for $25,000 or more. Repeat offenders face harsher penalties. The term "person" is clarified to include agents or officers of entities. The amendments also delete unrelated portions of the original bill.

Proposes to amend and enact provisions in Louisiana law (R.S. 14:71.5, R.S. 14:230.1(B)(8), and R.S. 15:1352(A)(89)) to create the crime of misappropriation of funds in connection with the payment of utility services, establish penalties, and integrate it into existing forfeiture and racketeering frameworks.

1. Creation of the Crime (Section 1, R.S. 14:71.5):

• Definition: It is illegal for a person who receives money under a lease or rental agreement to pay utility services (e.g., water, electricity, gas, broadband) to knowingly fail to use that money to settle the utility bills.
• Penalties:
• Imprisonment at hard labor for up to 10 years, a fine up to $100,000, or both.
• Full restitution to victims and others financially harmed by the offense.
• If the offender is indigent, the court must set a periodic payment plan based on their financial ability.
• Property Seizure: Any property used to commit or facilitate this crime is subject to seizure and forfeiture under R.S. 14:230.1.
• Definitions:
• "Person": Includes individuals and entities (e.g., corporations, partnerships).
• "Utility services": Encompasses water, electricity, gas, broadband, cable, heat, steam, telecom, or sewer services, regardless of ownership type.

1. Seizure and Forfeiture (Section 1, R.S. 14:230.1(B)(8)):

• Amends existing law to add misappropriation of utility funds (R.S. 14:71.5) to the list of offenses where facilitating property, proceeds, and commingled funds (even from those who should have known of the crime) are subject to seizure and forfeiture.

1. Racketeering Activity (Section 2, R.S. 15:1352(A)(89)):

• Adds misappropriation of utility funds to the list of crimes constituting "racketeering activity" under the Louisiana Racketeering Act, making it eligible for enhanced penalties and prosecution under racketeering laws.

1. Technical Adjustment (Section 3):

• Directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to renumber R.S. 15:1352(A) to properly incorporate the new provision (R.S. 15:1352(A)(89)).

Targets individuals or entities that collect utility payments under lease or rental agreements but fail to apply them appropriately, creating a new felony offense with significant penalties. By integrating this crime into forfeiture and racketeering statutes, it aims to deter such financial misconduct, protect utility service providers and tenants, and provide avenues for victim restitution.

Aims to amend sentencing guidelines for violent offenders in Louisiana. Here’s a summary of its key provisions:

1. Sentencing for Violent Offenders (R.S. 15:524):

• This section applies to individuals convicted of felony crimes of violence as defined under R.S. 14:2(B), unless the district attorney pursues charges under the Habitual Offender Law (R.S. 15:529.1).
• For a third conviction, the offender must be sentenced to at least 50% of the maximum sentence prescribed for a first conviction of that offense.
• For a fourth or subsequent conviction, the offender must be sentenced to at least 75% of the maximum sentence prescribed for a first conviction.

1. Amendment to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 817(B):

• Current law allows juries to make specific findings of fact that increase the maximum or mandatory minimum penalty for a crime, excluding prior convictions.
• The proposed amendment removes the exclusion of prior convictions, allowing the jury to consider and make specific findings regarding prior convictions as well, which could influence sentencing.

1. Purpose and Citation:

• The bill is designed to strengthen sentencing for repeat violent offenders and is officially named "The Segus Jolivette Act."

The legislation establishes mandatory minimum sentencing thresholds for third and subsequent violent felony convictions and expands the jury’s role in determining facts related to prior convictions that affect sentencing. The digest provided by House Legislative Services clarifies that these changes build on existing laws without altering their core structure, except where specified.

Amends the state’s homicide laws by adding "cruelty to persons with infirmities" to the list of predicate felonies for first and second degree murder. Under the revised law:

• First Degree Murder (R.S. 14:30(A)(1)): This applies when an offender has specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm while committing or attempting certain crimes. The bill adds "cruelty to persons with infirmities" to existing offenses like aggravated kidnapping, rape, robbery, and cruelty to juveniles, making such a killing first degree murder.
• Second Degree Murder (R.S. 14:30.1(A)(2)): This covers killings during the perpetration or attempted perpetration of specified crimes, even without intent to kill or harm. The bill includes "cruelty to persons with infirmities" alongside crimes like aggravated arson, burglary, and terrorism.

The change elevates homicides involving cruelty to individuals with infirmities to the most serious murder classifications, aligning them with other grave felonies. The bill, prefiled under constitutional guidelines, aims to enhance protections for vulnerable populations by increasing penalties for such acts.

Amends the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law by adding three substances to Schedule I: N-Desethyl isotonitazene and Etonitazepipne (opiates), and Ethylphenidate (a stimulant). These additions, detailed under R.S. 40:964, target drugs with high abuse potential and no accepted medical use, including their derivatives. The Louisiana State Law Institute is directed to alphabetize the new entries. The bill enhances regulation of these substances to address addiction and abuse risks.

HB 22 enacts R.S. 18:1300.27, authorizing Concordia Parish’s governing authority to hold a one-time referendum on permitting video draw poker devices, as regulated under state law (Title 27, Chapter 8). The election, funded by the parish, must occur between 45 days and 6 months after adoption of an ordinance or resolution, following Louisiana’s Election Code. A majority “yes” vote allows video poker operations; a “no” vote bans them. The Louisiana Gaming Control Board must be notified of the result. Municipalities within the parish can still enact local bans regardless of the outcome.

• Process: The parish sets the date and ballot wording; the election aligns with R.S. 18:402(F) dates.
• Outcomes: Approval permits video poker; rejection prohibits licenses and operations.
• Limits: Only one election is allowed, but municipalities retain autonomy to prohibit video poker locally.
• Cost: Concordia Parish covers expenses.
• Could boost local revenue if approved, but risks social concerns (e.g., gambling addiction). Municipal opt-outs may create regulatory inconsistencies.

HOUSE committee amendments except Amendment 3 [Linked] which changes the manner of electronic submissions.

Modifies the procedure for handling post-sentence statements and documents under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 892(C). It mandates that for felony convictions, the clerk of court of the sentencing court must electronically submit required statements and documents (e.g., sheriff’s custody statement, indictment copy, Uniform Sentencing Commitment Order) to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPS&C). The DPS&C secretary is authorized to adopt rules via the Administrative Procedure Act to implement this process. The bill maintains the existing requirement that these documents physically accompany defendants transferred to penal or mental institutions.

Current Law (C)(1): Unchanged—statements and documents must physically accompany defendants to institutions and be handed to the officer in charge upon admission.

• New Provision (C)(2): For felony convictions committed to DPS&C custody:
• The clerk of court must electronically submit all required documents to DPS&C.
• Submission method is determined by DPS&C’s secretary.
• The secretary can promulgate rules to ensure compliance, following the Administrative Procedure Act.
• Applies specifically to felony convictions under DPS&C oversight, not all sentences.
• Mandates clerks of court to send sheriff-prepared statements and other documents electronically to DPS&C and allows rule-making to support this.
• Builds on existing law by adding an electronic submission requirement for felony cases.
• Efficiency: Electronic submission streamlines communication between courts and DPS&C, reducing reliance on physical document transfers for felony cases.
• Modernization: Aligns criminal procedure with digital record-keeping trends, potentially cutting delays and costs.
• Clarity: Ensures DPS&C receives critical sentencing information (e.g., time in custody, sentencing orders) promptly for felony offenders under its jurisdiction.
• Operational: Courts and DPS&C will need to coordinate electronic systems, possibly necessitating upgrades or standardization.
• Legal: Ensures DPS&C has immediate access to sentencing data, which could improve record accuracy and compliance with sentencing terms.
• Practical: May reduce errors or lost documents, though rural clerks with limited resources might struggle to comply initially.

HOUSE committee amendment [LINK] changes the bill’s language to specify that its provisions apply only when the age difference between the victim and the offender is two years or greater, removing the prior reference to “offender” alone.

Amends laws on sex offenses against minors. It adds to R.S. 14:42.1(A) that second degree rape includes nonconsensual intercourse with a victim aged 13-16 by an offender 17+, expanding the crime’s scope. C.Cr.P. Art. 571.1 extends the prosecution time limit to 30 years for any sex offense (per R.S. 15:541(24)) involving victims under 18, replacing a specific list. C.E. Art. 804(B)(5) raises the hearsay exception age for initial complaints of sexual assault from under 12 to under 13. Effective upon governor’s signature, it strengthens protections and prosecution windows for minor victims.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK]

• Creates the crime of intentionally infecting someone with an incurable sexually transmitted disease without consent.
• Defines penalties and establishes defenses for this crime under numerous statutes such as sex trafficking, juvenile pornography, prostitution of a juvenile, etc. see more at the link.
• Requires sex offender registration for those convicted.

Creates two crimes for intentionally exposing others to STDs:

Felony (Incurable STDs):

• Intentional infection without consent.
• Penalties: Up to $5,000 fine, up to 10 years prison (higher if victim is young, elderly, or disabled).
• Lifetime monitoring required post-release.

Misdemeanor (Curable STDs):

• Same definition, but for curable STDs.
• Penalties: Up to $1,000 fine, up to 6 months prison.

Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 893.2 and 893.3 to extend firearm enhancement sentencing provisions to plea agreements. The bill allows the district attorney and defendant to stipulate the applicability of mandatory minimum sentences under Article 893.3 when a firearm is involved in specific felonies or misdemeanors, such as crimes of violence, felony theft, burglary, or drug offenses. Key sentencing provisions include: • Possession of a firearm: Minimum 2-year sentence. • Use of a firearm: Minimum 5-year sentence. • Discharge of a firearm: Minimum 10-year sentence. • Use or discharge causing bodily injury: Minimum 15-year sentence. • Violent felony with a firearm: Minimum 10 years, or 20 years if discharged. The stipulation must specify the applicable provision and underlying offense. The bill retains the requirement for jury findings beyond a reasonable doubt if no plea agreement is reached.

Regulates bail bond enforcement by defining "bail enforcement agents," controlling their use of cellular tracking devices, imposing penalties for misuse, and refining warrant procedures.

Key points:

1.    Definition: "Bail enforcement agent" = licensed bail agent apprehending principals who skip bail (R.S. 15:1302(21)).

2.    Tracking Devices (R.S. 15:1313):

o  Mandatory court order required; unauthorized use banned.

o  Penalties: Up to $5,000 fine, 1-year imprisonment (general); agents face fines + license suspension (6 months, 1st offense) or revocation (2nd+ offense).

3.    Court Orders (R.S. 15:1318):

o  Agents must report all tracking data to court.

o  Eligible only with a commercial surety and bench warrant for non-appearance.

4.    Warrants (C.Cr.P. Art. 311(5)): Sureties can request warrants for defendants in other Louisiana parishes, not just foreign jurisdictions.

Impact

• Increases oversight and accountability for bail agents.
• Protects defendants by limiting tracking to court-approved cases.
• Clarifies and streamlines enforcement procedures.

Amends Louisiana law regarding the unlawful presence of certain sex offenders. The bill expands existing laws to include new restrictions on loitering near locations commonly used for school-related drop-offs and pickups.

Key provisions include:

• Prohibiting sexually violent predators and sex offenders (convicted of offenses involving victims under 13) from loitering within 1,000 feet of school pickup or drop-off locations between 6:00-9:00 AM and 2:00-5:00 PM when children are present.
• Defining “loitering” as lingering without lawful reason and “reasonable grounds” for belief in the presence of children based on their attire, school supplies, or time of day.

The bill reinforces existing laws by further restricting the movements of convicted sex offenders to enhance child safety.

Seeks to establish guidelines for deviating from mandatory minimum sentencing. The bill mandates that courts depart from the standard sentencing range when both a mandatory minimum sentence applies and significant aggravating or mitigating factors exist.

When deviating, the court must ensure that the sentence is proportional to the offense and the offender's history, and must document the reasons, specifying the relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances.

Aggravating circumstances include factors such as deliberate cruelty, multiple victims, use of weapons, and prior offenses. Mitigating circumstances include factors like lack of premeditation, coercion, cooperation with law enforcement, or efforts at rehabilitation.

This bill will weaken the criminal justice system and the deterrence that is built in.

Proposes an amendment to Louisiana's Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the discharge of bail obligations. The bill allows a surety to be fully released from bail obligations if they can provide proof of the defendant’s deportation.

The surety may submit this proof before the defendant’s failure to appear or within 180 days after a warrant notice is issued. If obtaining such proof is difficult, the surety or the court can initiate a hearing to establish the defendant’s deportation. If the court confirms the deportation, the surety is entirely relieved of liability.

This measure clarifies and formalizes a process to prevent bail forfeiture in cases involving deported defendants.

Proposes amendments to the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 334 regarding the notice of a warrant for arrest.

Key changes include:

• Expanding the recipients of the notice of a warrant for arrest to include the defendant, bail agent or bondsman, personal surety, and commercial surety.
• Allowing electronic notification for agents or bondsmen who opt-in by filing a "Notice of Electronic Notification Opt-In" form.
• Clarifying that failure to send notice to both the commercial surety and the opted-in agent or bondsman within 60 days of the defendant’s failure to appear releases the surety from all obligations under the bail undertaking.

The bill aims to improve transparency and efficiency in notifying relevant parties about an arrest warrant while ensuring compliance with bail obligations.

Amends Louisiana’s Habitual Offender Law (R.S. 15:529.1). The bill primarily modifies the calculation of time intervals between offenses to determine whether a defendant qualifies as a habitual offender.

Key changes include:

• Shifting the reference point for determining the time gap between offenses from the “expiration of correctional supervision” to the “completion of sentence, probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.”
• Maintaining the five-year threshold for most offenses but refining how the period is computed by excluding time spent incarcerated, on probation, or under parole supervision.
• Retaining a ten-year threshold for offenses classified as violent crimes or sex offenses but applying the same adjustments in computing the time interval.

These changes could impact sentencing outcomes by potentially extending the timeframe in which prior convictions influence habitual offender status. The revisions aim to ensure that time served in correctional supervision does not contribute to the lapse period required to avoid habitual offender sentencing.

Proposes legislation to authorize the governing authority of Claiborne Parish to conduct a local referendum on permitting the operation of video draw poker devices within the parish.

If enacted, the bill would allow the parish governing authority to call an election by ordinance or resolution, specifying the date and the proposition's wording. The election could be held on any date permitted by R.S. 18:402(F), provided it occurs more than 45 days but not more than six months after the ordinance or resolution's adoption. The election would follow the procedures outlined in the Louisiana Election Code for proposition elections.

Should the majority of electors vote in favor, video draw poker operations would be permitted in Claiborne Parish as provided by law. Conversely, a majority opposing vote would prohibit the issuance of licenses for such operations in the parish. The governing authority is required to promptly notify the Louisiana Gaming Control Board of the election results, and the parish would bear the election's costs. Notably, the bill stipulates that only one such election may be held under this authorization.

HOUSE floor amendment technical

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] Clarifies that individuals under R.S. 27:602 are subject to the Gaming Control Board's authority, can be found unsuitable, and may be required to repay up to $250 for costs related to the board's review.

Proposes amendments to R.S. 27:29.3(A) and (B)(1)(b) and (2), and the repeal of R.S. 27:29.3(F), concerning non-gaming supplier permits in the gaming industry.

The proposed changes include:

• Issuing non-gaming supplier permits to suitable persons who provide goods or services to license holders, casino gaming operators, or sports wagering operators, with the Louisiana Gaming Control Board setting thresholds for when such permits are required.
• Allowing the board to require any person furnishing goods or services to these entities to be found suitable or apply for a non-gaming supplier permit, regardless of the transaction amount.
• Permitting the division to waive the requirements for obtaining a non-gaming supplier permit if deemed unnecessary to protect public interest or achieve policy objectives.
• Prohibiting entities licensed to conduct gaming operations from contracting for goods or services with their employees who hold key gaming employee permits.

Proposes regulations concerning the handling and presentation of fentanyl as evidence in Louisiana courthouses.

Key Provisions:

1. Prohibition of Fentanyl in Courthouses: The bill seeks to ban the physical presence of substances containing fentanyl in courthouses. Instead, authenticated photographs and certificates of analysis from accredited criminalistics laboratories would serve as substitutes for the actual substance during legal proceedings.
2. Exceptions for Prescription Holders: Individuals with valid prescriptions for medications containing fentanyl would be permitted to bring their medication into courthouses, provided they present a copy of the prescription to court security upon entry.
3. Judicial Discretion: Judges retain the authority to allow the physical presence of fentanyl in the courthouse if deemed necessary for trial purposes. In such cases, only trained law enforcement officers would be authorized to handle the substance, ensuring adherence to safety protocols.
4. Notification and Handling Procedures: When the presence of fentanyl in the courthouse is authorized, the responsible law enforcement agency must notify court security at least one day in advance, specifying the relevant case. Post-presentation, the substance must be returned to the custody of the law enforcement agency, with court security informed upon its removal from the courthouse.

The proposed legislation aims to enhance safety within courthouses by minimizing direct exposure to fentanyl, a substance known for its high potency and associated health risks.

HOUSE committee amendments technical

Proposes amendments to Louisiana laws concerning certain sex-related crimes, specifically focusing on penalties and the allocation of fines collected from these offenses.

Key Provisions of the Bill:

1. Amendments to R.S. 14:82.2 (Purchase of Commercial Sexual Activity):

• First Offense: Offenders may face a fine up to $750, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. Half of the collected fines are designated for distribution in accordance with R.S. 15:539.4.
• Second Conviction: Penalties include a fine between $1,500 and $2,000, imprisonment (with or without hard labor) for up to two years, or both, with half of the fines allocated as specified above.
• Third and Subsequent Convictions: Offenders face imprisonment (with or without hard labor) ranging from two to four years, a fine between $2,500 and $4,000, or both, with half of the fines distributed accordingly.
• Offenses Involving Minors or Trafficking Victims:
• If the offender knows the individual is under 18 or a victim of human trafficking, penalties include a fine between $3,000 and $50,000, imprisonment at hard labor for 15 to 50 years, or both, with half of the fines allocated as specified.
• If the individual is under 14, penalties increase to a fine between $5,000 and $75,000, imprisonment at hard labor for 25 to 50 years, or both, with half of the fines distributed accordingly.

1. Amendments to R.S. 14:83 (Soliciting for Prostitutes):

• General Offense: Offenders may be fined up to $750, imprisoned for up to six months, or both, with half of the fines allocated as specified.
• Second or Subsequent Offense: Penalties include a fine between $1,500 and $2,000, imprisonment for up to one year, or both, with half of the fines distributed accordingly.
• Offenses Involving Minors:
• If the person solicited is under 18, penalties include a fine between $3,000 and $50,000, imprisonment at hard labor for 15 to 50 years, or both, with half of the fines allocated as specified.
• If the person solicited is under 14, penalties increase to a fine between $5,000 and $75,000, imprisonment at hard labor for 25 to 50 years, or both, with half of the fines distributed accordingly.

Allocation of Fines:

The bill specifies that half of the fines collected from these offenses are to be distributed in accordance with R.S. 15:539.4, allocating funds to support victims of sex-related crimes, such as contributions to special funds or programs aimed at assisting exploited children or survivors.

Implications:

The proposed amendments signify a legislative effort to impose stricter penalties on individuals involved in sex-related crimes, particularly those involving minors or victims of human trafficking.

Proposes amendments to Louisiana's laws concerning penalties for operating a vehicle while impaired (DWI). The bill seeks to provide courts with the authority to offer alternatives to the mandatory installation of ignition interlock devices, specifically by allowing the use of electronic alcohol monitoring devices.

Key Provisions of the Bill:

• Alternative Monitoring Options: The bill permits courts to order offenders to wear a functioning electronic alcohol monitoring device instead of requiring the installation of an ignition interlock device on their vehicles. This alternative applies during the probation period following a DWI conviction.
• Restricted Driver's Licenses: Offenders may apply for a restricted driver's license during the suspension period by demonstrating to the Department of Public Safety and Corrections that they are either wearing a functioning electronic alcohol monitoring device or have installed a functioning ignition interlock device in their vehicle. The bill specifies that an ignition interlock device is not required for those who opt for and obtain a restricted license using the electronic alcohol monitoring device.
• Applicability: These provisions apply to both first and second offense DWI convictions, with specific amendments to various sections of the Revised Statutes and the Code of Criminal Procedure to incorporate the alternative monitoring options.

By introducing electronic alcohol monitoring devices as an alternative to ignition interlock devices, the bill aims to provide flexibility in monitoring DWI offenders while ensuring public safety.

HOUSE floor amendments technical

Proposes amendments to the state's probation revocation procedures. The bill seeks to modify Articles 900 and 901 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, focusing on the following key areas:

1.    Probation Revocation Authority:

The bill clarifies that upon revocation of probation, the court has the discretion to determine whether the defendant will receive credit for time previously served on probation.

2.    Definition of Technical Violations:

The proposed legislation revises the classification of certain offenses. Specifically, it allows the court discretion to deem violations of Title 40 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950 (which pertains to controlled substances) as technical violations, except for misdemeanor possession of marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or related chemical derivatives, as well as offenses involving drug paraphernalia. These exceptions are explicitly considered technical violations under the bill.

3.    Probation Revocation for New Offenses:

The bill amends the grounds for probation revocation when a defendant commits a new offense. It specifies that a defendant on probation for a felony who is subsequently convicted of a felony or certain misdemeanors may have their probation revoked either from the date of the commission of the new offense or upon final conviction.

4.    Drug or Specialty Court Program Participants:

An additional provision addresses defendants ordered to complete a drug or specialty court program as a condition of their probation. If such a defendant commits a new felony or is convicted of one and fails to successfully complete the court-ordered program, their probation shall be revoked from the date of the commission or final conviction of the new felony.

Overall, HB 214 aims to provide courts with greater discretion in handling probation violations, particularly concerning drug-related offenses, and emphasizes stricter consequences for probationers who commit new offenses or fail to complete mandated rehabilitation programs.

Proposes amendments to existing laws to permit the purchase of lottery tickets via the internet.

Key Provisions of the Bill:

1.    Legalization of Online Lottery Ticket Sales:

o  The bill introduces definitions for "I lottery" (internet-based lottery ticket purchases) and "I lottery gross revenues" (gross revenue from online lottery sales minus winnings paid out).

o  It amends R.S. 14:90 and R.S. 14:90.3 to specify that purchasing lottery tickets online does not constitute gambling or gambling by computer.

2.    Regulatory Framework:

o  The Louisiana Lottery Corporation's board is authorized to adopt rules for online lottery operations, including:

§ Age verification methods to prevent sales to individuals under 21.

§ Location verification to ensure purchases occur within Louisiana.

3.    Revenue Allocation:

o  The bill mandates that after the first year of operation, no less than 25% of gross revenues from both traditional and online lottery sales be transferred to the state treasury.

What could possibly go wrong? The State Freedom Caucus Network does not rec gambling bills. But this is a really bad idea.

Aims to broaden the state’s legal mechanisms for addressing blighted and nuisance properties, particularly in urban areas, by revising criminal and administrative definitions and processes.

Key Provisions:

1.    Expanded Definition of Blighted Property:

The bill broadens the scope of what qualifies as "blighted property" to include both vacant and occupied properties that have been declared blighted through administrative or judicial means. The property must be deemed a public nuisance by relevant authorities (either courts or hearing officers).

2.    Refined "Public Nuisance" Definition:

Expands the legal definition to include properties that threaten public health, safety, or property due to disrepair or hazardous conditions. The term also covers structures that contribute to decline in neighborhood quality or public welfare.

3.    Criminal Blighting of Property:

Introduces or clarifies the offense of criminal blighting, targeting property owners who intentionally or through criminal negligence allow property to fall into dangerous or unsanitary condition. This offense applies after an official declaration of blight or nuisance, ensuring due process is met.

4.    Enforcement Enhancements:

Allows for criminal penalties against owners who fail to address issues after administrative declarations. Encourages intervention by municipalities and local governments, possibly leading to property seizure or remediation.

5.    Administrative Hearing Process:

Supports the use of administrative adjudication (rather than only judicial proceedings) to declare properties blighted or nuisance, which can streamline enforcement. Empowers local hearing officers to make formal declarations, enabling quicker municipal action.

Intent and Implications:

The bill is a response to persistent urban decay, especially in cities like New Orleans where absentee ownership, neglect, and unsafe structures pose risks to neighborhoods. There’s no language in the bill that offers a defense or mitigation specifically tied to financial hardship. For example, it doesn’t mention exceptions for owners who can prove they lack the financial means to remediate the property. The law appears to treat the failure to correct blighted conditions as a strict liability issue once the property is certified as blighted, regardless of the owner’s financial situation.

That said, in practice, financial difficulties might be considered indirectly:

• At the administrative hearing level (referenced under La. R.S. 13:2575 or 13:2576), an owner could potentially raise financial hardship as a reason for non-compliance before the property is officially declared blighted. However, this would depend on local ordinances or the discretion of the hearing authority, not this specific statute.
• Courts might also take financial circumstances into account during sentencing (e.g., reducing fines), but the bill itself doesn’t mandate such consideration.

Aims to standardize the state's electronic monitoring system for individuals under pretrial or post-conviction supervision to ensure consistent implementation and enforcement statewide. The bill proposes amendments to R.S. 15:571.36 and the repeal of R.S. 15:835, focusing on several key areas:

1.    Definitions:

It clarifies terms such as "department," "manufacturer," "provider," and "system" to ensure consistent interpretation within the statute.

2.    Rule Promulgation:

The Department of Public Safety and Corrections, along with other relevant agencies, is tasked with developing and implementing rules governing:

o  Certification standards and registration requirements for electronic monitoring service providers and manufacturers.

o  Mandatory requirements for electronic monitoring equipment, including secure storage, regular inspections, inventory management, and response protocols for system malfunctions.

o  Accuracy standards for tracking the location of monitored individuals both indoors and outdoors, with specific timeframes for providing location data upon request.

o  Development of zoning capabilities, defining inclusion and exclusion zones for monitored individuals.

o  Alert notifications for equipment tampering, presence in exclusion zones, and low battery warnings, with specified response times.

3.    Management System:

The bill also introduces the Monitored Individual Management System (MIMS) to centralize and streamline the oversight of individuals under electronic monitoring. Currently there is no centralized system for managing individuals under electronic monitoring only requirements for reporting and data collection.

HOUSE committee amendments technical

HOUSE committee amendment [LINK] create the crime of using a drone over a permitted parade or parade route without authorization. Violators face a fine of $2,000–$5,000, up to one year in jail, and forfeiture of the drone. It applies to Mardi Gras, school, and other permitted parades. No-fly zones must be posted, and lack of knowledge is not a defense. Exceptions are made for permitted film or TV production use.

Amends existing laws regarding the unlawful use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), commonly known as drones. The bill proposes to add specific definitions and authorizes law enforcement agencies to employ certain mitigation measures against drones operating in a "nefarious manner."

Key Provisions of the Bill:

1.    Definitions Introduced:

o  "Mitigation measures" are defined as actions, such as jamming, taken to cause electronic interference to neutralize, intercept, disable, or disrupt a UAS to prevent illegal or harmful activity.

o  "Nefarious manner" refers to the use of a UAS for illegal, dangerous, or harmful purposes, including but not limited to spying, smuggling contraband (as defined in R.S. 14:402), facilitating criminal activity, or posing a direct threat to public safety.

2.    Authorization for Law Enforcement:

o  Law enforcement officers or agencies are permitted to take reasonable and necessary mitigation measures against UAS threats operating in a nefarious manner.

o  Such measures may include detection, tracking, identification methods, and the interception or disabling of a UAS through legal and safe methods, including jamming, hacking, or physical capture.

o  Actions can be taken only if there is reasonable suspicion that the UAS is involved in criminal activity, poses an imminent threat to public safety, or is otherwise operating in violation of state or federal law.

3.    Title of the Act:

o  The bill may be cited as the "We Will Act" Act.

Additionally, the bill directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to alphabetize and renumber the definitions in R.S. 14:337(B) and correct any cross-references as necessary.

This proposed legislation aims to equip law enforcement with clearer authority and tools to address the misuse of drones, enhancing public safety and security.

CHANGING THE TERM SQUATTER TO ADVERSE POSSESSOR IS RIDICULOUS

Seeks to address the issue of unauthorized individuals occupying immovable property. The bill proposes several amendments and additions to existing Louisiana law to facilitate the removal of such individuals.

Key provisions of the bill:

1.    Definition of "adverse possessor": The bill introduces the term "adverse possessor," defined as any person who remains on property without a right of possession, ownership, occupancy, or a lease interest. This term replaces "squatter" in the existing statutes.

2.    Authority for warrantless arrests: The proposed legislation allows peace officers to arrest an adverse possessor without a warrant if there is reasonable suspicion that the individual has violated any provision of Louisiana law.

3.    Establishing reasonable suspicion: The bill outlines that reasonable suspicion can be based on specific, objective, and articulable facts, including:

o  Signs of forcible entry

o  The condition of the property

o  Observations from neighbors

4.    Role of complaints: Complaints from neighbors, witnesses, or other interested parties are considered sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion for an officer to make an arrest.

5.    Amendments to criminal trespass laws: The bill modifies current trespass statutes to incorporate the term "adverse possessor" and clarifies that remaining on property after being directed to vacate by the lawful possessor—either verbally, through written notice, or via conspicuous signage—constitutes criminal trespass.

In summary, House Bill No. 262 aims to streamline the process for removing unauthorized occupants from immovable property by defining "adverse possessors," granting law enforcement the authority to act based on reasonable suspicion, and updating the language in existing trespass laws.

HOUSE committee amendment technical

Proposes amending existing statutes to replace the term "pornography involving juveniles" with "child sexual abuse materials." This change aims to update the language in various sections of Louisiana law to more accurately reflect the nature of offenses involving sexual exploitation of minors.

The bill seeks to amend multiple Revised Statutes (R.S.), including R.S. 14:73.8, 81.1, and others, to ensure consistent terminology across legal provisions. For instance, R.S. 14:73.8 addresses unauthorized use of a wireless router system for accessing such materials, while R.S. 14:81.1 pertains to the production, promotion, advertisement, distribution, and possession of these materials.

HOUSE floor amendments [LINK] include:

• Adds a new provision to enact Code of Criminal Procedure Article 230.1(E). This new paragraph defines the phrase "conclusion of the case" for legal purposes
• Defines “conclusion of the case” as the entry of final judgment in the trial court by conviction, acquittal, or dismissal of all charges, and includes completion of sentencing if applicable.
• Updates the bill title and body to reflect the new definition.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] scale back the bill to focus only on changes to bail and pretrial procedures. They remove unrelated sections, delete most of the original bill text, and keep only amendments to three specific criminal procedure Articles 230.1(B), 293, and 294(D) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.[SEE BELOW]

Proposes significant changes to Louisiana’s Code of Criminal Procedure, aiming to strengthen rights for indigent defendants and speed up pretrial timelines.

1.    Appointment of Counsel (Article 230.1(B))

Current Law:

Appointment of counsel for indigent defendants is not consistently mandated from the initial appearance onward.

Proposed Change:

Requires immediate appointment of counsel at the first court appearance for indigent defendants. Counsel must remain through case resolution unless private counsel is retained. 

2.    Preliminary Examinations (Articles 292 & 293)

Current Law:

Preliminary exams are discretionary and not guaranteed, especially when grand jury indictments are involved.

Proposed Change:

Courts must grant a preliminary exam upon request in all felony cases, unless already indicted. Courts must also appoint counsel for indigent defendants and hold exams promptly.

3.    Transcript Access (Article 294(D))

Current Law:

Transcripts are provided at the court’s discretion; costs are typically borne by the requesting party.

Proposed Change:

Mandates prompt transcript delivery when requested. Indigent defendants receive transcripts at no cost.

4.    Time Limits for Filing Charges (Article 701(B))

Current Law:

·       60 days for most felonies

·       120 days for capital/life imprisonment felonies

Proposed Change:

·       15 days for most felonies

·       30 days for capital/life felonies

Proposes amendments to Louisiana's charitable gaming laws to support children's charities. The bill defines a "children's charity" as a nonprofit organization licensed as a distributor as of December 31, 2024, with a primary mission to improve the lives of children facing hardship.

Key provisions include:

·       Authorization for children's charities: Allows children's charities to obtain non-commercial lessor's licenses and conduct consecutive eight-hour sessions of keno, bingo, and video bingo within a 24-hour period.

·       Protection of licensing rights: Prohibits local governing authorities from denying or revoking local bingo licenses of charitable organizations that hold a current Louisiana charitable bingo license.

·       Operational flexibility: Ensures that children's charities are not restricted by existing laws, such as Act 235 of the 2023 Regular Session, from acquiring new video bingo machines, operating existing gaming hall locations, or opening new locations for fundraising purposes.

·       Local participation: Mandates that municipalities and parishes permit children's charities to participate in or operate existing keno, bingo, or video bingo locations offering charitable gaming within their jurisdictions.

Additionally, the bill introduces the crime of "theft of bingo proceeds," imposing penalties for misappropriating funds intended for charitable purposes.

HOUSE floor amendment [LINK] adds definitions for “radio signal” and “wire.” It clarifies that a “radio signal” includes texts, emails, or other wireless transmissions from devices used for monetary transactions, and that “wire” refers to wired devices that access the internet or other systems for sending or receiving money.

Proposes amendments to Louisiana's financial crime statutes. The bill introduces penalties for second or subsequent convictions of illegal transmission of monetary funds and bank fraud, including imprisonment ranging from one to ten years and fines up to $100,000. It also mandates restitution to victims in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure Article 883.2, with provisions for indigent offenders to follow a court-ordered payment plan. Additionally, the bill amends the definition of "financial institution" to refer specifically to any federally insured depository institution chartered under U.S. or state laws. Furthermore, it allows the prosecution in bank fraud or monetary instrument abuse cases to introduce certain evidence demonstrating the perpetrator's intent to defraud, such as prior incidents involving counterfeit instruments or warnings from law enforcement.

Pproposes increasing the daily payment rate by the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPS&C) to parish jails for housing state inmates. The increases are scheduled as follows:

·       2025-2026: $35 per day

·       2026-2027: $37 per day

·       2027-2028: $39 per day

·       2028-2029 and onward: $40 per day

The previous rate was $26.39 per day since the 2020-2021 fiscal year. This bill aims to gradually raise compensation over several years to address costs related to inmate housing.

Amends procedures related to capital punishment in Louisiana. The key changes include:

1.    Warrant Issuance and Notification: Sheriffs must serve execution warrants on the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (DPS&C). A copy of the warrant must be sent to the condemned person and the governor.

2.    Execution Date Reset Procedures: When a stay of execution or reprieve ends, the trial court must reset the execution date within 30-45 days. If a stay is lifted before the set expiration period, the original execution date can proceed.

3.    Witnesses at Executions: Replaces the requirement for a priest or minister with a broader "spiritual advisor." Removes the specified number of witnesses (previously 5-7) and allows the DPS&C secretary to determine the appropriate number.

4.    Execution Time Window: Changes the permissible execution time from 6:00-9:00 p.m. to 4:00-9:00 p.m.

5.    Repeals R.S. 15:569.1: Removes a redundant provision about execution timing.

The act takes effect upon gubernatorial signature or lapse of time for gubernatorial action.

Provides promotional play allowances for gaming operators who make capital investments in Louisiana through tax credits.

Key Provisions: 

1. Increased Promotional Play Credit: 

  - Current law allows gaming operators up to $5 million annually in promotional play wagers, which are untaed. 

  - The proposed law allows operators to earn additional promotional play credits equal to qualifying capital outlays. 

2. Credit Limits: 

  - Credit cannot exceed 10% of certified capital outlay or 20% of gross gaming revenue, whichever is greater. 

  - Credits can be claimed for up to 10 years, after which unused credits are forfeited. 

3. Certification Requirement: 

  - The Louisiana Gaming Control Board must certify capital expenditures as "qualifying capital outlays" before promotional play credits are earned. 

4. Definition of Qualifying Capital Outlay: 

  - Includes expenditures for lands, buildings, equipment, or other improvements made after January 1, 2022, to increase taxable revenue or enhance licensed gaming facilities. 

  - Includes projects to move riverboat gaming facilities landside. 

5. Strategic Economic Development Plan: 

  - Louisiana Economic Development is directed to prepare and submit a strategic plan regarding gaming taxes and incentives by January 1, 2027. 

Potential Impact: 

The bill incentivizes capital investment in gaming facilities by providing tax credits tied to qualifying investments.

HOUSE floor amendments include a technical set and amendments [LINK} clarifying records of juvenile criminal conduct cannot be included in background checks shared outside the criminal justice system. It requires the state bureau to adopt rules ensuring privacy, proper use, and lawful purging of these records. It also reinforces that juvenile criminal history must be handled according to specific provisions in the Children's Code.

Modifies current law to allow juvenile records to be included in criminal history record information and supports the development of interoperable criminal justice information systems.

Key Changes: 

1. Adds Children’s Code Article 412(P) stating that confidentiality rules for juvenile records do not restrict the creation of integrated criminal justice information systems at the state and local levels. 

2. Amends R.S. 15:576(2) to remove language that excluded juvenile records from the definition of “criminal history record” or “criminal history record information.”

Implications: 

- Juvenile records may now be part of an individual's official criminal history. 

- Facilitates broader data sharing across agencies for identification, investigation, prosecution, adjudication, and sentencing. 

Purpose: Revises laws governing the Office of the State Public Defender and district public defenders. 

 Key Provisions: 

1. Board Meetings: 

Allows the Louisiana Public Defender Oversight Board to meet virtually under R.S. 42:17.2. Limits virtual meetings to two per calendar year. 

 2. District Public Defenders: 

Clarifies that district public defenders who contract with the state are independent contractors, not agents of the state. 

 3. Discipline and Hearings: 

Limits the right to a hearing to cases of discipline or early termination only—not for non-renewals. Establishes a five-member board hearing committee for disputes. Sets burden of proof: preponderance for discipline; clear and convincing for termination. Committee may issue subpoenas, administer oaths, and require sworn testimony. 

 4. Indigency Appeals: 

Prohibits clerks from charging fees for writ or appeal filings when the applicant has been deemed indigent. 

Impact: 

Clarifies contractor status of district defenders, narrows hearing rights, strengthens board authority, and removes court fees for indigent applicants.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] clarify that inmates in solitary confinement may access educational training or religious materials, but access can be denied if it's a security risk, not feasible, or conflicts with the reason for confinement. They also define "educational training" as programs offered at the facility and remove references to certification and specific program types.

Requires correctional facilities to provide prisoners placed in solitary confinement with access to all educational materials available as it would be in the least restrictive housing, within 24 hours, regardless of behavior or whether the materials are requested.

Key Provisions: 

- Applies to all prisoners placed in solitary confinement. 

- Educational materials include vocational training, high school equivalency, special education, literacy programs, higher education, and similar programs. 

- Responsibility to provide materials falls on the highest-ranking supervisor present at the facility. 

- Access must be provided within 24 hours of placement in solitary confinement. 

Definitions: 

- “Educational materials” include any academic or vocational programs offered at the facility. 

- “Solitary confinement” is defined as involuntary placement of a prisoner alone in a cell separated from the general population for any reason.

FISCAL NOTE over $7 million in 5 years; ENGROSSED fiscal note unchanged. [Large portion of the setup money appropriated last year through law enforcement board]

HOUSE floor amendments [LINK] require the sheriff or designee to immediately notify all local law enforcement agencies, media outlets, victims, and known witnesses if an inmate escapes. Notification must be made by the fastest reasonable means. If the inmate is recaptured, those same parties must be notified within one working day. The amendments also define “law enforcement agency” and “local media outlet” and update the bill title to reflect the new content.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] adds a new section, R.S. 15:715, requiring sheriffs or their designees to immediately notify all local law enforcement agencies, media outlets, known witnesses, and victims when an inmate escapes from a parish jail or prison. If the inmate is recaptured, those same parties must be notified within one working day. The amendment defines “law enforcement agency” and “local media outlet” for clarity.

Creates a comprehensive, statewide victim services system and establishes a consolidated Crime Victims' Bill of Rights. Directs the Department of Public Safety and Corrections to coordinate services across law enforcement and prosecutors, with implementation required by July 1, 2026. Codifies over 20 specific rights for crime victims, witnesses, and family members, including notice of proceedings, protection measures, access to services, and the right to make victim impact statements. Clarifies that violations of these rights do not create grounds for a defendant to overturn a conviction or sentence. Requires the Governor’s Office to publish a printable version of the Bill of Rights.

Rights for Crime Victims and Designated Family Members (20):

1. Right to emergency, social, or medical services and to receive a Victim Notice and Registration Form.

2. Right to be notified of defendant’s arrest, release, bond, escape, or re-apprehension.

3. Right to advance notice of and presence at judicial proceedings or probation hearings.

4. Right to be interviewed by the prosecutor before trial and request restitution.

5. Right to have those interviews in a private setting with access to support personnel if requested.

6. Right to refuse interviews with the defense attorney.

7. Right to retain legal counsel for discussions with the DA and judicial agencies.

8. Right to request a conference with the prosecutor regarding case disposition and restitution.

9. Right to employer assistance regarding work absences due to case participation.

10. Right to be notified of court scheduling changes.

11. Right to a secure waiting area during court proceedings, away from the defendant and their family.

12. Right to review and comment on pre- or post-sentence reports.

13. Right to protections under laws governing criminal procedure and evidence.

14. Right to a speedy disposition and final resolution post-conviction and sentencing.

15. Right to be present and heard at all critical stages, including submitting a victim impact statement.

16. Right to request that a victim impact statement be sealed for privacy.

17. Right to notice of sentencing range and opportunity to comment on proposed sentence.

18. Right to have personal property returned.

19. Right to seek restitution from the defendant without court filing fees.

20. In death penalty cases:

   - Right to be notified of execution details and to be present.

   - Right to not be contacted by the offender or their supporters.

Rights for Witnesses and Designated Family Members (5):

1. Right to emergency, social, or medical services and to receive a Victim Notice and Registration Form.

2. Right to be notified of the offender’s release, sentence discharge, escape, or re-apprehension.

3. Right to employer assistance for participation-related absences.

4. Right to be notified of scheduling changes.

5. Right to a secure waiting area during court proceedings.

Effective upon governor's signature.

Updates existing statutes to change references from the "Louisiana Public Defender Board" to the "Office of the State Public Defender" and replaces references to "indigent defender programs" with "district public defender offices." The bill standardizes terminology and corrects cross-references across multiple areas of Louisiana law, including criminal procedure, children’s code, retirement systems, judicial expense funds, ethical standards, and indigent defense funding methods.

Notable provisions:

- Maintains existing standards for appointing counsel on a rotational basis.

- Removes permission to deviate from appointment lists except as required by law.

- Removes outdated requirements for statewide implementation of the Safe Return Representation Fund.

The bill does not significantly alter current substantive law but ensures consistent terminology and clearer statutory language governing indigent defense services.

(Amends multiple statutes across R.S. 9, 11, 13, 15, 22, 36, 42, 46, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Children's Code; repeals R.S. 15:161(H))

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] offer extensive changes too voluminous to include here. See the link to review.

Expands the number of allowable video poker devices at certain businesses and restricts their placement near sensitive properties.

Key Provisions:

- Increases devices at alcoholic beverage facilities from 3 to 4, with a $50,000/quarter revenue requirement for the fourth device.

- Raises the cap for hotels/motels from 12 to 13 total devices.

- Raises truck stop limit from 50 to 60 machines, with adjusted fuel sales thresholds.

- Prohibits new licenses for offtrack wagering facilities within one mile of historic sites, public spaces, residential areas, or religious/school/library buildings.

- Allows local designation of residential districts where zoning does not exist.

- Grandfathers in existing offtrack wagering facilities as of Jan. 1, 2025.

- Adjusts franchise fee allocations to include new devices.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] update the definition of "net slot machine proceeds" to limit how much promotional play wagers can be deducted. Starting in 2026, eligible facilities may deduct up to $5 million or a percentage of taxable revenue, whichever is greater. The percentage cap increases over time: 4% in 2026, 7% in 2027, and 10% in 2028 and beyond.

Allows gaming operators to deduct a greater amount of promotional play from net gaming proceeds and gross revenue over time.

Key Provisions: 

- Retains $5M minimum annual deduction for promotional play wagers. 

- Adds a percentage cap deduction based on taxable revenue: 

 • 4% in 2026 

 • 7% in 2027 

 • 10% in 2028 and beyond 

- Applies to definitions of both "net gaming proceeds" and "gross revenue."

Creates a temporary adult-use cannabis pilot program in Louisiana to test and evaluate the feasibility of a permanent recreational marijuana framework.

Key Provisions: 

- Establishes the "Adult-Use Cannabis Pilot Program Regulation and Enforcement Act." 

- Authorizes the Louisiana Department of Health to regulate adult-use cannabis under rules similar to the medical program. 

- Limits participation to existing licensed therapeutic marijuana retailers, cultivators, and labs. 

- Requires participants to notify the department 90 days before program start and comply with the state's marijuana tracking system. 

- Allows only adults 21+ to purchase adult-use cannabis. 

- Sets annual permit renewal fees at $5,000 per participant. 

- Applies state and local sales tax to adult-use cannabis sales. 

- Reduces wholesale fee from 7% to 3.5% for participating cultivators during the pilot; non-participants remain at 7%. 

- Pilot runs from January 1, 2026, to July 1, 2029. 

- Maintains sales tax exemption for medical marijuana; adult-use sales are taxable.

HOUSE committee amendment technical

Directs the Louisiana State Law Institute to study and recommend possible changes to the rules for recusing judges in criminal cases. The study aims to improve fairness and consistency. A report is due to the legislature by February 1, 2026.

HB 650 by Rep. Jordan

Summary: Increases the mobile sports wagering tax and creates a compensation fund for overdetention.

Key Provisions:

• Raises the mobile sports wagering tax from 15% to 17%.
• Dedicates 2% of tax proceeds to a new Overdetention Compensation Fund.
• Fund pays $70 per day to individuals held beyond their scheduled release date.
• Receipt of payment does not limit the right to pursue civil lawsuits.
• Administered by the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement.

HOUSE committee amendments [LINK]:

• Expands the study requested by the resolution to include analyzing how other states allow internet lottery ticket sales.
• Specifically requests evaluation of whether using existing contracts or obtaining new vendors would better maximize revenue and benefit Louisiana.

Requests the House Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice (or a subcommittee) to study the feasibility and revenue potential of selling lottery tickets online in Louisiana, Findings must be reported before the 2026 Regular Session.