(1400 House floor votes analyzed - so far...)
Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
Date: 2025-04-14
Author: Wilford Carter (D)
Pending: 🏛 Administration of Criminal Justice 61 📅 Not Scheduled


Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Administration of Criminal Justice.
Date: 2025-04-14
Author: Wilford Carter (D)
Pending: 🏛 Administration of Criminal Justice 61 📅 Not Scheduled
Seeks to establish guidelines for deviating from mandatory minimum sentencing. The bill mandates that courts depart from the standard sentencing range when both a mandatory minimum sentence applies and significant aggravating or mitigating factors exist.
When deviating, the court must ensure that the sentence is proportional to the offense and the offender's history, and must document the reasons, specifying the relevant aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
Aggravating circumstances include factors such as deliberate cruelty, multiple victims, use of weapons, and prior offenses. Mitigating circumstances include factors like lack of premeditation, coercion, cooperation with law enforcement, or efforts at rehabilitation.
This bill will weaken the criminal justice system and the deterrence that is built in.

Last Action: Effective date: 08/01/2025.
Date: 2025-06-08
Author: Wilford Carter (D)
📅 Not Scheduled
HOUSE floor amendment technical
Focuses on the office of the Ward Three marshal of the city court of Lake Charles. The bill amends R.S. 13:2079.1 to authorize the use of community policing funds as an additional source of compensation for deputy marshals.
Previously, the marshal could use a portion of salary derived from civil fees to supplement deputy marshal salaries and cover operational expenses. The proposed amendment expands this by explicitly allowing funds from community policing to be used for the same purpose. However, it maintains the restriction that no deputy marshal’s salary can exceed that of the Ward Three marshal.

Last Action: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Civil Law and Procedure.
Date: 2025-04-14
Author: 👤 Wilford Carter (D)
Pending: 🏛 Civil Law and Procedure 44 📅 Not Scheduled
Introduced on the recommendation of the Louisiana State Law Institute, seeks to reform the laws governing the partition of property in Louisiana. The bill proposes amendments to existing statutes and the enactment of new provisions to streamline and clarify the processes involved in partitioning property among co-owners and heirs.
Key Provisions of the Bill:
Overall, House Bill No. 175 represents a comprehensive effort to modernize Louisiana's property partition laws, emphasizing fair and efficient processes for dividing property among co-owners and heirs.
Amends bail procedures and considerations in Louisiana's Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly focusing on the factors in setting bail and the process for modifying bail amounts.
Key Changes:
1. Presumption of Innocence as a Bail Consideration (Art. 316):
Adds a new factor to be considered when fixing the amount of bail: “The presumption of innocence until the defendant is proven guilty.”
The factor is added to existing considerations such as seriousness of the offense, danger posed to the community, defendant’s criminal history, ability to give bail, etc.
2. Modification of Bail (Art. 319):
Clarifies that courts can increase or reduce bail amounts or require new or additional security for good cause.
· The primary purpose of bail is to ensure the defendant’s appearance in court. Considering presumption of innocence downplays legitimate concerns about fleeing.
· Bail determinations should heavily weigh prior criminal history and patterns of recidivism. Ignoring this in favor of presumption of innocence can result in releasing dangerous individuals who have repeatedly committed crimes.
· Fails to adequately protect victims, especially in cases of domestic violence, stalking, or sexual assault if easier release
· Restricts judges' ability to evaluate all relevant factors, especially in serious or complex cases where the defendant’s release poses significant risks.