(1400 House floor votes analyzed - so far...)
📅 No upcoming hearing scheduled
🕗 Bills Pending: 52
Last Action: Effective date: 06/08/2025.
Date: 2025-06-08
Author: Beth Billings (R)
📅 Not Scheduled


Last Action: Effective date: 08/01/2025.
Date: 2025-06-04
Author: Beth Billings (R)
📅 Not Scheduled
Seeks to revise the criteria and procedures for the recognition, maintenance, and revocation of political parties in Louisiana.
Key Changes:
1. Prohibition of "Independent" or "Independent Party" Registration (R.S. 18:107(G)):
- From August 1, 2025, individuals cannot register as "Independent" or with the "Independent Party."
- Such registrants will be designated as "No Party." Existing "Independent" registrants will also be changed to "No Party."
- Department of State is responsible for notifying affected registrants.
2. Increased Requirements for Party Recognition (R.S. 18:441(B)(1)):
- Voter Threshold: Increased from 1,000 to 5,000 registered voters for party recognition.
- Registration Fee: Increased from $1,000 to $5,000.
- Party recognition is required 90 days before the qualifying period for any election.
3. Prohibition Against Recognizing Parties Named "Independent" (R.S. 18:441(B)(4)):
- Political parties named solely as "Independent" or "Independent Party" cannot be recognized in Louisiana.
4. Provision for Party Recognition Rescission (R.S. 18:441(E)):
- A political party can voluntarily rescind recognition through procedures outlined in its bylaws and a notarized statement filed with the Secretary of State.
- Registrants affiliated with a rescinded party will be reclassified as "No Party" and notified by the Department of State.
Implications:
- The bill aims to avoid confusion with "Independent" party designations and tighten the requirements for party recognition.
- Increased thresholds and fees may limit the formation of smaller or newly established political parties.
- Enhanced procedures for voluntary rescission provide a clear process for disbanding parties.

Last Action: Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection and International Affairs.
Date: 2025-06-01
Author: Beth Billings (R)
Pending: 🏛 Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs 7 📅 Not Scheduled
HOUSE floor amendments technical
HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] remove page three lines 10-19 in their entirety which are generally about how hair braiding is not a licensed action, etc. See BILL LINK page three.
Amends and repeals certain licensing requirements and regulations administered by the Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology regarding alternative hair and alternative hair design. It eliminates the special permit and the 500-hour instructional requirement for practitioners of alternative hair styling, citing the lack of significant health or safety risks and unnecessary barriers to economic opportunity.
Key Provisions:
- Amends definitions for "alternative hair" and "alternative hair design," clarifying what activities are included and explicitly excluding the use of chemical or dye treatments on natural hair.
- Removes the requirement for a Special Permit for Alternative Hair Design, previously mandatory for individuals practicing alternative hair styling.
- Eliminates the rule mandating practitioners of alternative hair design to operate only within licensed cosmetology salons.
- Repeals the mandatory 500-hour curriculum previously required for alternative hair design licensing.
- Requires the state register to update the Louisiana Administrative Code accordingly.
The resolution argues that current licensing rules for alternative hair styling impose unnecessary economic barriers without providing meaningful health or safety protections.

Last Action: Effective date: 06/08/2025.
Date: 2025-06-08
Author: Beth Billings (R)
📅 Not Scheduled
HOUSE floor amendments technical
Focuses on enhancing executive branch compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It outlines the powers and responsibilities of the state ADA coordinator’s office and modifies the return-to-work program for state employees.
Key points:
Centralizes the oversight of disability accommodations under the state ADA coordinator instead of multiple agencies.
Last Action: Effective date: 08/01/2025.
Date: 2025-06-08
Author: Beth Billings (R)
Co-sponsors: Mike Bayham (R) Tehmi Chassion (D) Steven Jackson (D) Joy Walters (D)
📅 Not Scheduled
HOUSE committee amendments [LINK] clarify boundary lines.
Proposes amendments to R.S. 56:651 concerning hunting preserves in Louisiana.
Key provisions of the bill include:
The bill aims to regulate the licensing of hunting preserves, specifically addressing the geographical areas where such preserves can operate within the state.
Last Action: Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House.
Date: 2025-05-05
Author: Beth Billings (R)
📅 Not Scheduled
Last Action: Taken by the Clerk of the House and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with the Rules of the House.
Date: 2025-05-05
Author: Beth Billings (R)
📅 Not Scheduled
Proposes amendments to the Louisiana Administrative Procedure Act (APA), specifically regarding how courts and administrative officials interpret state statutes and rules during judicial reviews of agency adjudications. Below is a detailed analysis of its content, intent, and potential implications based on the text provided. This bill lines up Louisiana administrative law with the US Supreme Court Chevron decisions, once again giving primacy to statue not regulation—courts must interpret the law not give undue weight to agency interpretations.
Overview of HB99
Aims to shift interpretive authority from state agencies to courts, administrative judges, or hearing officers by mandating a de novo (fresh, independent) interpretation of statutes and rules, explicitly prohibiting deference to agency interpretations.
Key Provisions:
1. Courts, administrative judges, or hearing officers must not defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute or rule and must interpret it de novo.
2. In cases involving a state agency, any remaining ambiguity after applying standard interpretive tools must be resolved in favor of limiting agency power and maximizing individual liberty.
Bottom line: