Carbon Capture: You Have No Property Rights

   

Carbon capture is not a new development, but has received more scrutiny recently. A handful of legislators have picked up the torch to champion your right to personal property by carrying several vital pieces of legislation. Opposition forces are mobilizing to stop these reforms. The question now is: Who will prevail, the people or the profiteers? Join us as we explore this topic further.

Louisiana’s Public Policy

The sequestration of carbon dioxide by geologic storage has a public purpose and serves the public interest of the state’s citizens. That is what our legislature decided in 2009 with the passage of the Louisiana Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide Act, which followed the passage of the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 by the U.S. Congress.

The Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 created the 45Q tax credit, a federal subsidy that pays corporations for every ton of carbon dioxide they claim to capture. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 later expanded and extended that credit. Then, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 further extended deadlines to begin construction.

That tax credit has been expanded over the years. Corporations are currently receiving $85 per ton of carbon captured, but are lobbying heavily to increase that number to $250 per ton. The U.S. Department of the Treasury estimated that in March of 2022, Section 45Q tax expenditures for 2022-2026 would be $2.4 billion. Spending for the period of 2022 -2032 is expected to rise to $30.3 billion. Your tax dollars are fueling the carbon capture craze in Louisiana, just another transfer of wealth program orchestrated in Washington, D.C. Unfortunately, our representatives in Baton Rouge were the first in line to support the program, and if history repeats itself, we will be the last ones to reverse course.

Eminent Domain

If you still hold onto the fluffy language in the Declaration of Independence, it may be time to snap out of it and take action. The writers of that document referenced “unalienable rights” to include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Jefferson specifically meant Locke’s doctrine of estate or property ownership with the much broader phrase of “pursuit of happiness.”

Like so many in the founding generation, Jefferson also gave us plenty of warnings.

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

Jefferson and other like-minded men of his day opposed federally funded internal improvements. While the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provided an avenue for the central authority to seize private property for “public use” as long as just compensation was provided, this was the exception rather than the rule because the federal government’s role was mainly kept within the restraints of the Constitution.

Content made possible by:
EXO Drones

These founding warnings were not theoretical. Today, their fears are realized in Louisiana statutes written to benefit industry over individuals.

In Louisiana, You Have Property Privileges, Not Rights

Possessing a driver’s license is a privilege, not a right. Most of us have probably heard different versions of that phrase. But if someone were to tell most of us that owning property is a privilege, not a right, we would instantly be infuriated and become argumentative. That is precisely what we have in Louisiana, though.

The Louisiana Constitution contains a declaration of rights, with Article 1, Section 4 specifically addressing the “right to property.” It reads in pertinent part:

Every person has the right to acquire, own, control, use, enjoy, protect, and dispose of private property.  This right is subject to reasonable statutory restrictions and the reasonable exercise of the police power.

Property shall not be taken or damaged by the state or its political subdivisions except for public purposes and with just compensation paid to the owner or into court for his benefit.

Property shall not be taken or damaged by any private entity authorized by law to expropriate, except for a public and necessary purpose and with just compensation paid

Your “right” to property exists at the whim of the legislature. As it pertains to carbon capture, your legislature has specifically sold your right to corporations.

Content made possible by:

Carbon Capture Expropriation

Louisiana Revised Statute 33:1108 specifically gives private corporations a “legal” path to steal your property. The law states:

Any storage operator is hereby authorized, after obtaining any permit and any certificate of public convenience and necessity from the commissioner required by this Chapter, to exercise the power of eminent domain and expropriate needed property…

All it takes is a permit and a rubber-stamped certificate from an unelected bureaucrat, and your property may no longer be yours.

Algernon Sidney, who was heavily read by the founding generation, wrote:

“That which is not just, is not law; and that which is not Law, ought not be obeyed.”

Sidney was executed for penning those words. Not publishing them, not speaking them… just for writing them down.

Legislation to Protect Your Property Interest

Several bills seeking to protect your property interest concerning carbon capture have been presented and are presently being debated. Representative Brett Geymann‘s (R 7/10) House Bill 601 seeks to severely curtail the circumstances under which private corporations can gain control of your land for carbon sequestration.

House Bill 4 by Representatives Chuck Owen (R 9/10), Beryl Amedee (R 10/10), Dodie Horton (R 9/10) and Rodney Schamerhorn (R 9/10) seeks to allow for increased local autonomy by allowing parish governing authorities and residents through an election to determine whether carbon dioxide injection wells should be permitted. House Bill 75 by Representative Danny McCormick (R 10/10) seeks to ensure that if you are going to be the victim of corporate theft, you at least receive the maximum amount of compensation as paid to other owners.

These bills have been met with heavy opposition from corporations and lobbyists. Publicly opposing all three bills are:

HB4 has received the most opposition, including from other organizations such as:

Money Over Safety

Carbon sequestration has always been about money! It doesn’t matter how it is packaged and repackaged; it is about transferring your private property, both your tax dollars and your land, into the hands of a few. This is continuing despite real safety concerns.

Five years ago, the town of Satartia in our neighboring state of Mississippi discovered how unsafe carbon sequestration can be. Your regular pipeline operates at around 700 pounds per square inch (psi), but carbon sequestration pipelines operate closer to 2,200 psi, making them highly susceptible to explosion.

The ruptured pipeline in Satartia, Mississippi, spewed CO2 gas for about four hours. Excess carbon dioxide can cause thirst for oxygen, disorientation, and heart malfunction in people. Forty-five people were hospitalized, and over two hundred were evacuated from this rural community. The excess CO2 also starved motor vehicles of oxygen, severely hampering emergency responders. Yet, our public policy in this state remains to allow corporations to seize your land to reap the reward of getting your tax dollars from Washington, D.C.

It is time for this chaos to end! These bills may be the last chance to stop the unchecked spread of carbon pipelines across Louisiana. Contact your legislator and demand that private land rights and public safety come before federal subsidies and corporate greed.

###

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This