The Louisiana House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment killed a series of bills designed to give local communities and property owners more power in response to growing concerns over carbon dioxide (CO₂) sequestration projects.
The legislation reflects mounting resistance to the rapid expansion of carbon capture infrastructure, particularly by large corporations, and seeks to ensure that citizens’ rights aren’t trampled.
Local Control and Property Rights at the Forefront
- HB4 by Rep. Charles Owen empowers parish governments to decide whether Class VI CO₂ injection wells—used for long-term underground storage—can be permitted within their boundaries. This bill underscores the demand for local autonomy.
- HB75 by Rep. Danny McCormick strengthens landowner rights by requiring fair compensation for pore space owners—those whose underground property may be used for CO₂ storage—addressing concerns about uncompensated land use by energy companies.
- HB380 and HB553 by Rep. Rodney Schamerhorn strike at the heart of corporate influence by removing or prohibiting the use of eminent domain for CO₂ sequestration and pipelines. These bills seek to prevent private companies from seizing land under the guise of the public good.
Safety, Oversight, and Accountability
- HB568 by Rep. Dewith Carrier creates new safety and accountability procedures for carbon capture and storage projects, emphasizing public protection over industry speed.
- HB537 by Rep. Schamerhorn takes a bold stance on disaster response by authorizing liens in favor of victims of CO₂ pipeline incidents, ensuring affected residents have a legal pathway to recover damages.
- HB522 by Rep. McCormick imposes a moratorium on CO₂ sequestration, calling for a pause on projects until further study and regulation can catch up with the rapid expansion.
Technical and Structural Adjustments
- HB353 by Rep. Mack, HB601 by Rep. Geymann, and SB73 by Sen. Reese all address the legal and regulatory framework around CO₂ sequestration, proposing tighter rules and updated definitions to reflect growing environmental and property concerns.
Together, these bills reflect a concern that Louisiana’s citizens, not corporations, should guide the future of energy development in the state. With local control, safety measures, and property protections taking center stage, the message is clear: community voices must not be buried under industrial ambition.
###
Facts First. Even When They’re Inconvenient.
Some outlets or groups tell you what to think. Others have discovered there’s an easier way to build an audience: tell people exactly what they want to hear. We’ve chosen a harder path.
At Citizens for a New Louisiana, we start with the evidence — public records, financial disclosures, court filings, voting records, audits, and original documents — and follow it wherever it leads. Sometimes the facts confirm what we expected. Sometimes they surprise us. Sometimes they disappoint our friends. Either way, we publish them.
That approach doesn’t always produce the loudest headlines or the easiest fundraising. But over time, it produces something much more valuable: TRUST. If you value independent Louisiana journalism that puts evidence ahead of outrage and principle ahead of tribe, please help us continue the work.
Become a Monthly MemberContribute $10 NowMake a Tax Deductible Gift
Already have a donor-advised fund? Ask your DAF administrator about recommending a grant to New Louisiana Foundation.
